Sunday, 16 May 2021
The Three Old Ladies
Wednesday, 12 May 2021
Global Warming, Influencers, and Social Scientists.
Global warming. A topic heard almost everyday and found everywhere. It is the gradual but quick heat up of Earth because of the greenhouse gases that we produce. This is a problem that has been going on for years but was just brought to public awareness in the late 90s. The problem snowballed in the last 10 years and scientists have been warning the world that immediate actions must be taken to tackle it. However, we don’t see much progress. More innovative ways are needed to influence individuals to be more active to reduce their carbon emissions as the call to slow down climate change is so far ineffective in Indonesia.
Environmental activists and scientists have stepped up their efforts to bring awareness to the public about the peril of climate change. However, sadly, their efforts are futile. One of the reasons for that is because it’s very difficult to change people’s habits and lifestyles. Modern lifestyles are full of convenience and comfort, mostly due to the advancement of science and technology. Electronic appliances have made our lives so much easier. We use washing machines to wash our dirty clothes, refrigerators to keep our food fresh, and AC to keep ourselves cool during hot summer. These are essentials that we can’t live without, but they are also one of the major contributors to greenhouse gases. Knowing this, we should attempt to do something about it. It may be daunting to change lifestyles, but everyone can start small. We can start by reducing the amount of electricity we use. Only using electricity when necessary, such as turning on ACs after a certain temperature and humidity and purchasing energy-saving electronics are a few ways to save energy.
A change of lifestyle is a difficult one to make, especially when it’s about the usage of electronics and vehicles. To help encourage the change into a greener lifestyle, I think the government and scientists can work together with influencers and social scientists, like psychologists and sociologists, to influence the public. They can create a movement or trend that subconsciously influences people’s lifestyles into a greener one. Social scientists will then analyze the results of their experiment to create better methods in influencing people. An example would be an experiment that was conducted in an apartment complex. Three different stickers are prepared and each symbolises the amount of energy used by the residents. These stickers are put on each resident’s door to represent the amount of energy used by each housing. A red sticker for residents with the most energy usage, a green one for those improving, and a golden star for those who used the least amount of energy. This type of social competition evokes every person’s competitive side and each tries their best to reduce the amount of energy used. Perhaps through this experiment, social scientists could analyze how our competitive nature increases our efforts to create better results. This experiment might be more popular if influencers take part in these competitions and broadcast how each and every of them are trying to live an eco-friendly lifestyle.
To encourage this eco-friendly lifestyle movement, governments could also pay influencers to create the image that the eco-friendly life is the new elite. Eco-friendly products are usually more expensive than others, so this fits the image of a high-class person. Governments could buy and distribute to the influencers the eco-friendly products from the many eco-friendly entrepreneurs in Jakarta. Or perhaps they could give an eco-friendly house to the influencers to live in. An example of an eco-friendly lifestyle is the VSCO girls/boys. VSCO defines the lifestyle of a middle class teenager. They are well known to promote the use of metal straws and bring their own hydro flasks, with “Save the sea turtles” as one of their slogans. In a kind of way, this brought the public’s attention on how plastic garbage is harming turtles. If VSCO teens are a thing in Jakarta, then perhaps the government could fund the influencers’ VSCO life with all their eco-friendly products and lifestyle. As the public, especially the young generation, tends to follow and idolize influencers, they might follow whatever the influencers do. Sociologists can then be brought in to analyze the public’s response to this new trend and give new ideas for the influencers and governments to try out.
However, as much as influencers and social scientists can affect people to change their lifestyle, many might not be able to follow them due to the lack of infrastructure in Jakarta. Infrastructures are one of the main pillars of a person’s lifestyle. There is a lack of eco-friendly infrastructure to support an eco-friendly lifestyle. One thing that almost everyone in Jakarta owns, from the poor to the elite, is a type of private vehicle. Almost everyone uses private vehicles to the point that it has become Jakarta’s lifestyle. Affordable vehicles and lack of access to comfortable and safe public transportation results in a lot of people owning private vehicles. In addition to that, many of Jakarta’s roads are not improved or built, with many roads already outstripping the space capacity for all of Jakarta’s vehicles. This causes traffic jams to be frequently found in Jakarta’s roads. Large amounts of diesel is wasted and carbon dioxide produced more than necessary due to these traffic jams. As roads could take a long time to build, some people might think of switching to electric vehicles. However, they might have second thoughts due to the lack of electric stations to recharge their vehicles. Even if there are electric stations, most of Jakarta’s electricity is powered by fossil fuels. While the list of problems goes on, these are just some of the problems Jakarta experiences with their infrastructure.
Even though Jakarta’s progress in infrastructure is slowly improving, Jakarta needs drastic changes if it wants to speed up their reduction of greenhouse gases. I think that the government should first and foremost replace diesel powered plants to nature-powered ones. We are a tropical country with lots of water and sunlight, so surely we are able to maximize our usage of them. In this way, the use of household appliances won’t contribute any greenhouse gases. Secondly, governments should replace gas stations with electric charging ones. Before the replacement, the government could ask all private transportation owners to switch to electric ones before a certain date. They could offer incentives and affordable prices to encourage the public with this change. Influencers may also play a big role in this by promoting their electric vehicles. Perhaps with this collaboration, we can create massive transformations in our use of private vehicles.
Teamwork makes the dream works, and if governments, influencers, and social scientists work together, they can create a huge movement in the rapidly changing Jakarta. Every person in Jakarta is aware of global warming, but we need an extra push from governments and the media to create massive change. People are encouraged to change their lifestyles, but as changing habits isn't easy, influencers can influence the public to change while social experiments can be held to analyze factors that cause people to improve themselves. Infrastructures also need a massive and quick upgrade by the government to support the change of lifestyle. To create change amongst a large number of people, not only do we need scientists now, we will need the help of sociologists and others that specialize in human behavior.
Saturday, 6 March 2021
A Picture to Describe 2020
![]() |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWvSJqB3Q3Y |
Saturday, 6 February 2021
Sesame Street's Newest Muppets for Rohingya Children
Sunday, 17 January 2021
The Covid-19 Vaccine
As we come
to the end of 2020, people are seeing hope for the end of the pandemic as various
Covid19 vaccines are in their final clinical testing stage. The Pfizer vaccine
is one of them and it has now been approved for emergency usage in several
countries such as the United Kingdom and Canada. Despite announced to having a
90% efficacy, it still receives mixed opinions from the public. With the launch
of several Covid-19 vaccines around the world, we will now need to weigh the
pros and cons of taking the vaccine to make a crucial decision that will affect
not only our individual lives but the global community.
Vaccines are
crucial to combat Covid-19 and enable us all to return to a semblance of normal
life before the pandemic. Vaccines will help us achieve herd immunity. Herd
immunity will only happen when a half or a third of a population has the
immunity to defend themselves from the virus. It’s estimated that an infected
person can spread the virus to at least two or three people. If a lot of people
are already immune to the virus, then the spread of the virus will be
contained. Thus, this is where the role of vaccine becomes very important.
Vaccine can provide Covid-19 immunity in a safer way. When 75% of the community
has been vaccinated, the risk of a person getting the virus will be lower. Therefore,
we will all be able to go outside again, back to our daily activities.
Even though
we all know the benefit of being vaccinated, the short time it took to test the
vaccine is one of the main reasons people are hesitant to take the vaccine. Countries
are rushing to be one of the first to have a viable vaccine. US Government even
set up a program called the Operation Warp Speed. It offered large amounts of
money to companies that can produce a vaccine by a certain deadline. People
worry that the drug companies might be pressured to deliver the vaccines
according to the demand of the operation, affecting how they conduct the
clinical trials. Normally, before a vaccine can be distributed to the public,
it is required to go through multiple tests and trials. These can take many years
to ensure the vaccine's safety. When the trials are rushed, there are great
possibilities that there might be mistakes or inaccuracies.
Vaccine
development usually ranges from 4 to 10 years. So when drug companies announced
successful Covid-19 vaccine in less than a year, I was really sceptical. There
must have been some mistakes. After further research, I discovered that one of
the reasons researchers were able to speed up the vaccine development was due
to past researches of SARS and MERS. Both viruses are a type of coronavirus. In
addition to that, the massive amount of funding made it possible for drug
companies to run parallel tests. These 2 combined are the ultimate formula in
the race to fight Covid-19.
As countries around the world are rolling out the vaccines, all
eyes are watching closely for the effect and result of the vaccination. I am
fairly certain that drug companies would not be so careless and risk their
reputation in creating vaccines that are not safe for the public. Therefore, I
think that when the vaccine is available for me, I will choose to be
vaccinated. At least I would have done my duty as a responsible citizen and contributed
to returning the world back on track.
Friday, 18 December 2020
The Mau Mau Uprising
On June 11
1920, Kenya was colonized by the British for their fertile land. They became
part of British Africa with little to no advantages on their sides and
experienced an unjust period for around 42 years. Their lands robbed, taxed
heavily, and the people forced into labor work. Needless to say, it created
resentment between the British and Kenyans. Many revolted, with the most
significant one the Mau Mau Uprising. While they are regarded as terrorists, it
was this uprising that ultimately led to the independence of Kenya.
The Mau Mau first
started as a nationalist group dominated by Kikuyu people. The Kikuyu is the
largest ethnic tribe in the colony and they suffered the most in the hands of
the British. They pressed the British for their lands back, but with little to
no results. As time progressed, radical members of the Mau Mau created a
splinter militant group which used violence to drive away British authority. To
be a part of that group, the native African had to take an oath. It was
believed that if one break that oath, the repercussion would be death.
As the
British didn't want the world to know that they were the reason for the war,
they portrayed the Mau Mau as the culprits. In British news and media, they
represented the Mau Mau as a barbaric and cult-like group who made it their job
to raid both English settlers and local people alike. Meanwhile, they portrayed
themselves as "saviors" and claimed to help the locals against the
Mau Mau with weapons and soldiers. They labelled the locals that worked with
them as loyalists, so it sounded like the war is between the Mau Mau and
loyalists. They showed the British's compassion towards the locals in the
broadcasts, such as British troops honoring a fallen local tribe leader, and predicting
the Mau Mau's positions with Kenyan locals. In these broadcasts, there were no
words about the British coming to Kenya to claim the lands. Now that we're able
to gain more information about what really happened, we can see who the real
culprit is. It was the British who was the real perpetrator of violence in
Kenya.
It was true
that Mau Mau killed thousands of their own tribe, those who are loyal to the
British. However, the British also caused a great deal of deaths that they
didn’t report. Many Kikuyu men were rounded up and sent to concentration camps
with little food and poor sanitation and some were killed without trials, just
because they were suspected to be part of the Mau Mau group. I think it’s a
pity that so many lives were lost in the Mau Mau uprising, but at least the
movement freed the Kenyans from the rule of the British.
Thus, I
consider the Mau Mau as heroes of their country. Their determination for
independence brought more troubles to the British than its worth. Even when the
British had caught the Mau Mau's leader, Dedan Kimathi, the Mau Mau did not
dwindle and continued to fight. While the British came for fertile land to
plant crops, all they'd done is waste money on these wars. This results in the
British granting them independence 3 years later.
If I were a
Kikuyu, I would feel upset to be framed as a villain. I fought for my
independence, then why would I be the "bad guy"? However, it is also
difficult to judge an organization in times of war, as information may be hard
to achieve. If the whole world listened to the British news during the time of
war, I think many people would believe that the Mau Mau are
terrorists. I am pleased that more information about the Mau Mau were
discovered after the war and we can see their point of views about the event. It’s
interesting to see that historical perspectives about a historical event could
change greatly in years after. It’s always crucial to keep this in mind and be
critical for new evidence and facts.
![]() |
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mau_Mau_Uprising |


